THE MICHAEL BROWN OVER-POLICED RIGHTS ACT OF 2015
Section 1 (a) UNIVERSAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. All policing jurisdictions shall report the following information every twelve months to the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") in the manner that agency shall prescribe by rule: (1) The name, address, race, ethnicity and occupation (if known) of any person injured or killed by a firearm, taser, or other weapon designed to cause physical injury to, or which is used to subdue or control, persons, and which was fired by an officer of that policing jurisdiction. (b) To encourage accurate and prompt reporting, it is expressly provided that the report of any policing jurisdiction prepared pursuant to this Act may not be used as evidence against any individual police officer or officers in any civil, or administrative proceeding. Provided, however, that any information contained in the report that can be obtained elsewhere shall not be subject to this restriction. (c) ONE-TIME UNIVERSAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT. All policing jurisdictions shall report the items described above in (a)(1)-(18) for each of the preceding five years to the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") in the manner that agency shall prescribe by rule. (d) Each Section 1 report will be signed by the police unit's commanding officer and, based upon information and belief, sworn to be true and correct. Failure to comply with the universal reporting requirements described above shall subject that policing jurisdiction to designation as a Federal Over-Policed Rights Act Jurisdiction and subject it to forfeiture of any or all federal funding or equipment. The Department of Justice shall have the authority to enforce Section 1 of this Act. (e) The Federal Bureau of Investigation shall report the information provided pursuant to subsections (a)(1)-(18) each year to the public. (f) DEFINITIONS."Policing jurisdiction" shall include all state and local law enforcement entities of any size, including any officers privately contracted to provide law enforcement services by a political subdivision. "Weapon" or "other weapon" shall include any weapon used to subdue or inflict damage to a person. |
Section 2 (a) A natural person of the United States residing in a policing jurisdiction shall have the right to file an action in federal court seeking a declaration that the policing jurisdiction in which the complainant resides is an over-policed jurisdiction as that term is defined in Section 2(b) of this Act. Venue shall lie in the district of the complaining party's residence. (b) As used in this section, an over-policed jurisdiction is one that has shown a long-standing pattern of abuse, brutality or racial or language minority animus of at least eighteen month's duration. Any party who brings an action pursuant to Section 2(a) may show a long-standing pattern of abuse, brutality or racial or language minority animus using the information provided in Section 1 herein or any other reliable statistics which demonstrate that the policing jurisdiction has violated the Equal Protection rights of those in their jurisdiction by arresting, stopping, harming, detaining, issuing citations against, failing to hire, property seizures of, killing or assaulting members of a racial, ethnic, minority language group or other suspect class in a statistically significant greater percentage than that group is represented in that jurisdiction's population. A party who brings an action pursuant to Section 2(a) of this Act may make this showing without proof of willful action by the policing jurisdiction. (c) STANDING AND WAIVER OF FEES. By virtue of a person's residence in a jurisdiction and status as a member of the allegedly aggrieved racial, ethnic or language minority class, he or she is deemed to have standing to sue. Every person in a jurisdiction is affected in one way or another by the policing carried out there. Filing fees and any trial or witness fees for this action are waived. Complainant will be responsible for any fees necessary to effectuate Service of Process on the policing jurisdiction. The Complaint and all subsequent pleadings will be prepared and argued by an attorney in good standing in that federal district and follow current federal rules of civil procedure except as described herein or amended for good cause by the federal district court. (d) JURISDICTION; EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OR OTHER REMEDIES. The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this Act and shall exercise the same without regard to whether a person asserting rights under the provisions herein shall have exhausted any administrative or other remedies that may be provided by law. Trial will proceed before the judge without a jury. (e) SPEEDY TRIAL PROVISION. A hearing and disposition of this matter shall occur within six months after the policing jurisdiction has filed its Answer. The parties shall provide expedited discovery. No later than one month after the policing jurisdiction has filed its Answer, the court shall convene the parties to discuss discovery and case management. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 sanctions shall apply to all proceedings herein, as will the inherent contempt powers of the court. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 shall not, except that a policing jurisdiction may file a Motion to Dismiss if the complainant is not a resident of the jurisdiction. (f) CONSOLIDATION OF CASES. The court may consolidate multiple independent complaints for hearing. One continuance of no more than one month's duration may be granted by the court for good cause shown. (g) At the election of the Attorney General, the Department of Justice may enter the suit on behalf of the Complainant; however, if the Complainant voices an objection, he or she will be allowed to proceed with the Department of Justice appearing as a friend of the court, or the Department of Justice may withdraw, if it elects to do so. At any time during the proceedings and after adjudication, the Attorney General may appoint a local or state government authority as its designee to appear at hearings and receive reports and take all actions available to the Attorney General and Department of Justice under this Act. The designee will be reimbursed for all out-of-pocket expenditures. (h) If the court, after hearing, finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the policing jurisdiction has had a long-standing pattern of abuse, brutality or racial or language minority animus, which may be proved statistically and without direct evidence of intentional malice, then the court shall designate that policing jurisdiction as a Federal Over-Policed Rights Act jurisdiction. The policing jurisdiction may appeal, but there shall be no stay of this Act pending appeal. The complainant shall also have the right to appeal. |
Section 3 (a) PENALTIES, CONDITIONS AND PROBATION. This Act is not intended to limit the authority of a federal district court judge to tailor his or her order to a given situation. However, a designation as an Over-Policed Rights Act jurisdiction shall, at a minimum, result in the following, unless good cause is shown: (1) The court shall appoint volunteer observers of good moral character who reside in the jurisdiction to monitor the policing jurisdiction as described herein. (b) Volunteer observers shall be authorized to— (1) enter and attend at any place in which officers of the policing jurisdiction are conducting official business for the purpose of observing and documenting; provided, however, that the court may order that certain investigations involving organized crime or other matters shall not be subject to volunteer observation; and (c) The Federal Bureau of Investigation shall make available training materials for use by the Volunteer Observers. (d) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. In addition to the Universal Reporting Requirements described above, an Over-Policed Rights Act jurisdiction shall also meet the following reporting requirements and provide to the DOJ or its designee— (1) a description of every instance in which an officer during the performance of his or her professional duties unholsters a weapon of any kind in preparation for its use on any person; (e) ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES. An officer of an Over-Policed Rights Act jurisdiction who fails to report an action as described in Section 3(c)(1)-(4) commits a felony. An Over-Policed Rights Act jurisdiction that fails to report as provided for in Section 3(c)(5)-(8) is subject to contempt and the contempt powers of the federal court. The Department of Justice or its designee may investigate any instance involving an unholstered weapon, an assault or a battery, and it or its designee shall investigate every instance in which shots were fired, a taser employed or other weapon used at a person. |
Section 4 (a) PETITION FOR TERMINATION. After the expiration of one year or any longer term set by the court, the policing jurisdiction may petition the court for relief from the designation as a Federal Over-Policed Rights Act jurisdiction. (b) If by a preponderance of the evidence the court finds that the policing jurisdiction has followed the terms of its order and the strictures of this Act, has implemented any and all reasonable and narrowly-tailored recommendations made by the Department of Justice, and if the court finds that the police unit has been positively changed and is now focused on proper policing techniques, then the court shall lift the Federal Over-Policed Rights Act designation. In the alternative, the court may designate a reasonable term of probation if certain requirements have yet to be met. |
Section 5 (a) MISCELLANEOUS. Appropriations for this act will come from the Department of Justice's General Fund every year without vote. Provided, however, the Department of Justice may use funds obtained pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 524(c). The Attorney General shall transmit to Congress a report indicating the disposition of any § 524(c) funds used hereunder in the same manner as that Section provides. This Act may be cited as "The Michael Brown Federal Over-Policed Rights Act of 2015." (b) If any provision of this Act or the application of it to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of this Act and the application of its provisions to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances shall not be affected thereby. |